Part 6 - the final instalment - of our series with VHR Technical Recruiter Matthew Jasper, recorded ahead of MRO Americas 2026, Orlando, 21–23 April.
Read the series: Part 1 - Capacity Gaps | Part 2 - Behavioural Attributes | Part 3 - Role Design and Career Progression | Part 4 - Onboarding Investment | Part 5 - Value Beyond Sourcing
About VHR
VHR is a global technical recruitment specialist with deep roots in aviation, aerospace and defence. Operating across North America, Europe, the Middle East and beyond, VHR partners with airlines, MROs and OEMs to source, place and develop high-quality technical talent at every level, from certified A&P mechanics and AME technicians to senior operations and quality leadership. In a sector where a staffing gap is never just an HR problem, it's a compliance risk, a revenue event, and in some cases a safety concern, VHR's value lies not just in finding candidates, but in understanding the regulatory environments, endorsement landscapes and workforce dynamics that shape every hire.
Meet the Contributors
 |
Jerome Gray is a Growth Marketing Specialist at VHR, focused on the aviation and defence sectors across North America and the Middle East. |
 |
Matthew Jasper is a Technical Recruiter at VHR specialising in aviation across the UK and North America. With a background that spans internal HR, hands-on recruitment and deep industry network-building, Matthew brings a perspective that goes well beyond the CV, which, as this blog makes clear, is precisely the point. |
The Question – "How can a recruitment partner support future scopes of work?"
Most organisations think about recruitment as a response to a problem that already exists. A vacancy opens. A project is awarded. A key person resigns. The search begins. In a competitive talent market with long lead times for qualified technicians, that reactive model is a structural disadvantage, and the gap between when the need becomes visible and when qualified engineers are ready to work can cost contracts, delay programmes and undermine the relationships an operator has spent years building.
Matthew's answer to this final question is about something more fundamental: the shift from reactive hiring to strategic workforce preparedness, and the role a genuine recruitment partner can play in getting an organisation ahead of demand rather than perpetually behind it.
Attending MRO Americas 2026 in Orlando, 21–23 April? VHR's team will be at stand 5320. This is exactly the kind of conversation we have there. Pre-book your meeting with our specialist team →
Matthew's Answer
"The other thing a good recruitment partner can do, where we've got a good relationship and understand each other, is really help when you foresee a ramp-up. Because you've got a contract you're potentially about to win with a three- to four-month start time in the future. What we can do is get ahead of that by shortlisting and putting together a talent pool ready for you."
The Problem With Starting the Search After the Win
Matthew's framing is precise: the problem isn't the search itself, it's when it starts.
An organisation that wins a contract and then begins recruiting is already operating with a structural lag. Sourcing, screening, shortlisting, interviewing, offering, onboarding, in aviation maintenance, for endorsed and type-rated roles, this process rarely completes in under two months and often takes considerably longer. Beginning it on the day of contract award means beginning it weeks or months after the window to do it efficiently has closed.
"If you do win the contract, you are ready to go from day dot and you have people that you've already got to look at starting to interview, which saves a lot of time."
The inverse is equally significant. If the contract does not come through, the organisation's internal team has spent no time on it. That is precisely the point of engaging a recruitment partner on a retained basis for pipeline work, the risk of unproductive search time is transferred, not absorbed.
Talent Pooling: What It Is and Why It Changes the Dynamic
Talent pooling, in Matthew's model, is not a speculative exercise; it is a structured preparedness programme run in parallel with business development activity. While the organisation's teams are pursuing the contract, the recruitment partner is quietly building and qualifying a candidate pool aligned to the workforce profile that win would require.
By the time an award is confirmed, the pipeline is ready. First-stage screening is complete. Candidate motivations and availability windows have been established. Relocation conversations have happened. The hard questions, as discussed in Part 5 of this series, have already been asked and answered.
"In that four to five months, you aren't then starting the recruitment process one month before, or even getting to the day and realising: right, we need people. We can get ahead of things and have that talent pool there ready for you."
This is not just a time advantage. It is a quality advantage. Candidates sourced under time pressure are candidates sourced with reduced rigour. When the pool has been built carefully over months, the hiring manager receives genuinely qualified profiles, not the best available on a tight deadline.
Want to understand how VHR approaches proactive talent pooling for contract-stage clients? Speak to our aviation specialist team
The Internal Bandwidth Problem
Matthew's other key point concerns internal talent teams, and the reality that they are almost never resourced for speculative pipeline work.
"A lot of companies have internal talent teams, they're busy recruiting their own stuff. So it's good value to actually go out to a recruitment company and pay a retention fee on something like that, where they will then go away and do all the hard work for something that actually might not come through."
The numbers Matthew uses to illustrate this are instructive. An internal team working across 200 live roles at any given time simply does not have the bandwidth to build parallel pipelines for contracts that may or may not materialise in six months. And yet if the contract does materialise, that same team, already stretched, is suddenly expected to deliver a qualified workforce at pace, while continuing to manage its existing workload.
"If you've got an internal talent team working on 200 roles, and you may be winning a contract in six months that you're not sure about, well, they don't really have the bandwidth to go away and look at something that might or might not happen. But ultimately, if you do win the contract, you could then be in trouble. You're starting on the back foot."
A retained recruitment partner removes this bind entirely. The internal team stays focused on the roles that are live and urgent. The pipeline work happens in parallel, managed externally, at an agreed cost that reflects the speculative nature of the engagement. If the contract comes through, the organisation is ready. If it doesn't, the internal team has lost nothing.
The Retained Model: What It Looks Like in Practice
Matthew describes the retained fee model as the commercial mechanism that makes this partnership possible. Unlike a contingency search, where a fee is only payable on placement, a retained engagement involves an upfront investment in the partner's time and activity, in exchange for genuine commitment and exclusivity of effort.
For pipeline and future-scope work, this model makes particular sense. The recruitment partner is being asked to do real work, sourcing, qualifying, mapping, maintaining, on a programme that may not result in placements for months, and may not result in placements at all. A retained fee is the appropriate commercial structure for that commitment.
"It's give and take in terms of what we do for each other. On a retained fee percentage, they can go away and do the work while your internal talent team is still able to focus on the day-to-day roles that are currently affecting you in real time — but you're still having that preparedness ready for when that project comes through."
The result is a workforce-ready organisation: one that can move from contract award to mobilisation without the delay, cost and quality compromise of a reactive search conducted under pressure.
From Recruitment Pipeline to Full Project Delivery: VHR Aircraft Technical Services
There is a natural extension of the talent partnership conversation, one that is directly relevant when the future scope of work is not just a headcount requirement but a complete technical programme.
When an operator wins a modification contract, a maintenance programme, a lease return, or a large-scale production engagement, the question is rarely just "who do we hire?" It is often: "Do we have the internal capability to plan, manage, execute and certify this programme ourselves, and is that the most efficient use of our resources?"
For operators, MROs and OEMs who need certainty of delivery as much as certainty of cost, VHR Aircraft Technical Services (ATS) provides a different model entirely, fixed-price, end-to-end project delivery, where VHR takes ownership of the entire work package rather than simply supplying the people within it.
"VHR Aircraft Technical Services operates as a strategic extension of a client's engineering capability, allowing organisations to take on critical programmes without increasing permanent headcount or absorbing unnecessary risk."
VHR's team at MRO Americas 2026 includes specialists in senior-level technical hiring across North America. If you want to understand how your organisation is perceived in the talent market, and what it would take to strengthen that position, it's a conversation worth having.
Find us at stand 5320 in Orlando, 21–23 April → Book a pre-show meeting
What VHR ATS Delivers
VHR Aircraft Technical Services is the specialised project delivery and technical operations division of VHR, backed by over 88 years of combined senior engineering leadership experience. It provides fixed-price, fully managed solutions to airlines, MROs, OEMs and aerospace manufacturers across Europe, the Middle East and North America.
Where a recruitment partner sources the engineers, VHR ATS brings the entire delivery infrastructure: senior engineering governance, project management, technical documentation, quality assurance, tooling, logistics and regulatory compliance, all under a single agreed price with defined milestones and performance transparency from day one.
Programmes delivered include B737, B757 and B767 winglet installations, A320 cargo bay conversions, WiFi and IFE system installations across A320, A330, B737 and B777 fleets, major structural repairs across B787, A330 and Dash 8 Q400 platforms, and complex avionics upgrades across commercial and defence programmes.
Read more about what fixed-price project delivery means for aviation organisations
Why Fixed-Price Matters for Future-Scope Planning
The connection between Matthew's talent pooling conversation and VHR ATS's delivery model is directly relevant for organisations planning future contract wins. When the scope of work is well-defined, a modification window, a maintenance programme, a fleet conversion, the uncertainty that makes traditional resourcing models risky can be eliminated entirely.
A fixed-price engagement locks in scope, timeline, cost and outcomes before mobilisation begins. For an organisation bidding on a contract, this means it can enter commercial negotiations knowing exactly what delivery will cost, with no exposure to labour escalation, scope creep or resourcing gaps mid-programme. That commercial certainty is itself a competitive advantage.
How VHR ATS restores stability in high-pressure aviation operations
The strategic advantage behind VHR ATS delivery
The Through-Line: Partnership, Preparedness, Delivery
Across all six parts of this series, Matthew's answers have traced a consistent thread. The organisations that perform best in a shortage market are not the ones that react most quickly; they are the ones that have built the systems, relationships and processes that mean they rarely need to react at all.
A strong recruitment partner supports that preparedness at the hiring level: building pipelines ahead of demand, providing market intelligence that shapes strategy, setting expectations that prevent late-stage attrition, and investing in the relationship that makes all of this possible.
VHR ATS extends that same principle to the project delivery level: enabling organisations to take on complex, time-critical technical programmes with full cost certainty, senior engineering governance, and none of the internal resource risk that makes major commitments difficult to underwrite.
Together, they describe a complete workforce and delivery partnership, from the first conversation about a future contract to the moment the last aircraft returns to service.
Meet VHR at MRO Americas 2026
VHR's full aviation specialist team, including Matthew Jasper, Danny Brooks MBE (CEO and Founder) and Ryan Stewart, will be exhibiting at MRO Americas 2026, stand 5320, Orlando, 21–23 April. Whether you're mapping workforce requirements for a future contract, planning a technical programme, or want to explore what a retained recruitment partnership looks like in practice, we'd welcome the conversation.
Schedule your meeting ahead of MRO Americas →
